“The U.S. won’t be the world's leading superpower. A handful of countries will dominate”
An afterword for Creative Destruction
This title “The U.S. won’t be the world’s leading superpower. A handful of countries will dominate” is the second statement from the World Economic Forum’s video called “8 predictions for the world in 2030”.
On October Nineteenth 2023 I posted Creative Destruction. The purpose was to suggest that the breach of Israel’s border on October Seventh served to advance published globalist goals, and also to suggest that rival nations on both sides of every conflict have some important trends in common. Since then, the threat of a broader conflict pitting Israel, The United States and some of our most loyal allies against most of the world continues to grow.
These assertions were reinforced by the introduction of Chinese warships into the area as well as Russia’s continued active presence in Syria. After the situation in this war theater devolves to the point that the U.S Israeli coalition cannot hope for a stable resolution a “handful of countries” will be ready to assume military policing of the conflict zone. When the U.S. is no longer the world’s leading superpower, as foreshadowed by the World Economic Forum’s video, which predicted that a handful of countries will dominate international affairs, these dominant nations will not need to pretend to be answerable to some distinct geographic or cultural group of people. They will be freer to use the opinions of selected experts as guidance while claiming to act in the best interest of all of humanity, or in the best interest of the planet.
Early on, the October seventh event was called Israel’s 9/11. We were told to expect a long war. This reference to 9/11 should cause us to consider the lasting impact that the 9/11 event had on our lives and to consider the impact that it had on the conduct of government.
The national emergency declared on September 14, 2001, in Proclamation 7463 has been quietly renewed annually and it continues to be in effect to this day. Even though The War Against Terror is seldom mentioned by name anymore it truly has been a long war. It continues to shape our lives. The fear that gripped Americans in 2001 and that gave rise to an eagerness for military action had so long ago subsided before our humiliating retreat from Afghanistan, that the two events are seldom thought of as connected.
Doubting the official narrative of the events on 9/11 was at one time almost universally dismissed as unpatriotic. Questioning that same narrative now however is often met by agreement from others who then cite evidence against the official story-line. Shouldn’t we anticipate similar consequences from the October seventh event?
Promises to “demilitarize, deradicalize, and eventually rebuild Gaza” and even to deport some of those who survive the war should prompt us to speculate what sorts of solutions Governance by Crisis Management may impose this time. Angry Palestinians as neighbors to frightened Israelis, or as a diaspora, could require an extreme measure to assure that all are kept safe. Constant surveillance with monitoring and analysis of all activity and of every communication just might fit the bill. Just like no one could be safe unless everyone was vaccinated, no one will be safe unless everyone is under surveillance. The idea of evaluating all of mankind individually for the purpose of placing people where they are most useful to, or at least where they are not disruptive to the system, is not a new one. In his book UNESCO: its purpose and its philosophy, Julian Huxley wrote this, “The fact of human difference has another implication for Unesco. Every encouragement should be given to the study of distinct psycho-physical types. Such work has been begun by men like Kretschmer, Draper and Sheldon, but needs to be pushed much further before secure generalisations can be drawn from it. When the time comes, however, they will be important. For one thing they will be of great value in job selection, in picking those who are most likely to profit from a particular sort of training or are most suitable for a particular kind of work. Conversely, we shall then be enabled to lay down that certain types of men should be debarred from holding certain types of positions. Already considerable progress has been made, though largely on an empirical basis as yet, in fitting the right man to the right job-notably by the Selection Boards for officers which were set up during the late war.”
Historic grievances are gifts that don’t stop giving.
Let us now turn our attention back to the title of this writing, “The U.S. won’t be the world’s leading superpower. A handful of countries will dominate” The World Economic Forum has become known for publishing, in some form, the goals that our narrative managers are facilitating. Should we submit to the goals that a self appointed managerial class has chosen? With the diminished prestige and influence of The United States seemingly inevitable do we have any other choice? Since the decline of American Empire is inevitable, we are obliged to wrest control of empire’s dismantling away from the self-serving people and those entities that currently guide history.
Our negligence to clearly connect history to current events as well as our willingness to react thoughtlessly to the fearsome goads that constantly prompt our own voluntary submission, make it clear that the corruption among leaders is really a grassroots phenomenon, one that concentrates itself in those with authority. This is good news. It means the solutions are within reach if we choose to discover them. Our only impediments are the fear of uncertainty and our own unwillingness to make changes within ourselves. How a process of reform can succeed is a topic that I hope to explore soon.
“The U.S. won’t be the world's leading superpower. A handful of countries will dominate” © 2024 by Mark Gresham is licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International